I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/915)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: TelForceOne S.A. (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: M. Mielniczuk-Skibicka and E. Gryc-Zerych, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: 4Kraft sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland) (represented by: J. Skołuda, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2024 (Case R 677/2023-3).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.TelForceOne S.A. shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by 4Kraft sp. z o.o.
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/915/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*