I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 274/35
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia) (represented by: A. Pomares Caballero and M. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadine Helene Jeanne Hautrive (Chatou, France)
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—vary the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 May 2013 in Case R 757/2012-5, on the basis that, in the present case, the conditions for applying the relative ground for refusal of registration under Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 are met;
—or, failing which, annul the contested decision;
—and, in any event, order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Nadine Helene Jeanne Hautrive
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark with word elements ‘COLOMBIANO HOUSE’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 225 798
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Protected Geographical Indication with word elements ‘Café de Colombia’
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 14 of Regulation No 510/2006
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Article 13 of Regulation No 510/2006
—Breach of a procedural requirement through failure to state reasons