EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-307/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2010 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (NATURALLY ACTIVE) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark NATURALLY ACTIVE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of inherent distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired by use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0307

62009TA0307

December 9, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.1.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/38

(Case T-307/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark NATURALLY ACTIVE - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of inherent distinctive character - Lack of distinctive character acquired by use - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 30/68

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Earle Beauty (Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom) (represented by: initially M. Cover, and subsequently K. O'Rourke, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 May 2009 (Case R 27/2009-2), concerning registration of the word sign NATURALLY ACTIVE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 May 2009 (Case R 27/2009-2) in so far as it refused registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign NATURALLY ACTIVE for wash bags, cosmetic bags and cases, beach bags, handbags, shoulder bags, draw string bags, purses, wallets, vanity cases, make-up bags, canvas bags, cases for mirrors in Class 18 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of OHIM’s costs. OHIM is ordered to bear one third of its costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia