- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-781/23, Malmö Motorrenovering: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0781
62023CA0781
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/700
10.2.2025
(Case C-781/23, (1) Malmö Motorrenovering)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Union Customs Code - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 250 - Temporary admission procedure - Article 251 - Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain - Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use - Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period - Conditions for extending that period - Importation of a racing car)
(C/2025/700)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Malmö Motorrenovering AB
Defendant: Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket
Operative part of the judgment
Article 251 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/474 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019,
must be interpreted as meaning that an extension of the period during which goods placed under the temporary admission procedure, determined on the basis of paragraph 1 of that article, does not require the existence of ‘exceptional circumstances’, within the meaning of paragraph 3 of that article, where that extension does not mean that the overall period during which those goods may remain under that procedure exceeds the maximum duration of 24 months laid down in paragraph 2 of that article.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/700/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* Language of the case: Swedish.