I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-19/13)(1)
((Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Decision granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation - Request for internal review of that decision - Lack of measure of individual scope - Commission decision declaring the request for a review inadmissible - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 311/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Frank Bold Society, formerly Ekologický právní servis (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Černý, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: P. Oliver and L. Pignataro-Nolin, and subsequently by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller and D. Hadroušek, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of (i) Commission Decision C(2012) 8382 final of 12 November 2012 rejecting as inadmissible the request for internal review of Commission decision C(2012) 4576 final of 6 July 2012 granting the Czech Republic an option for transitional free allocation for the modernisation of electricity generation, and (ii) the latter decision.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Frank Bold Society is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
3.The Czech Republic shall bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.