- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-473/11: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2014 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Weleda Trademark (MENOCHRON) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark MENOCHRON — Earlier Community word mark MENODORON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0473
62011TA0473
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
(Case T-473/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark MENOCHRON - Earlier Community word mark MENODORON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 184/44
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Longevity Health Products (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weleda Trademark AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland) (represented by: W. Haring, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2010 (Case R 2345/2010-4), relating to an opposition procedure between Weleda Trademark AG and Longevity Health Products, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15