- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-338/23, Bravchev: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber Chamber) of 9 January 2024 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against M.S.S. and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Interpretation of national law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0338
62023CB0338
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/2003
18.3.2024
(Case C-338/23, (1) Bravchev (2))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation of national law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction - Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/2003)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Third party: Sofiyska gradska prokuratura
Operative part of the order
1.The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the fourth question referred by the Sofiyski gradski sad (Sofia City Court, Bulgaria), by decision of 25 May 2023.
2.The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sofiyski gradski sad (Sofia City Court) is manifestly inadmissible as regards the other questions referred by that court.
(1) OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2003/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)