I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – State aid – Formal examination procedure – Community framework for State aid for environmental protection – Rights of the parties – Invitation to submit observations – Article 88(2) EC – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Environmental purpose of the investment
3. Appeals – Grounds – Plea unsupported by legal argument – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see para. 99)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 November 2004 in Case T‑176/01 Ferriere Nord v Commission, dismissing an action for, first, the annulment of Commission Decision 2001/829/EC, ECSC of 28 March 2001 on the State aid which Italy is planning to grant to Ferriere Nord SpA (OJ 2001 L 310, p. 22), declaring incompatible with the common market aid notified as environmental aid which the autonomous Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Italy) is planning to grant to the applicant in the form of a financial contribution to investments in new plant for the production of electrowelded wire mesh to reduce noise and eliminate waste in the form of iron oxide, and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following adoption of that decision.
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Ferriere Nord SpA to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.