- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-439/21: Action brought on 20 July 2021 — Anglofranchise v EUIPO — Bugrey (BOY LONDON)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0439
62021TN0439
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.9.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 357/33
(Case T-439/21)
(2021/C 357/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Anglofranchise Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi, N. Parrotta, R. Perotti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yuliya Bugrey (Milan, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark BOY LONDON –European Union trade mark No 11 708 773
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 April 2021 in Case R 459/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal;
—Order Yuliya Bugrey to pay the applicant’s costs of the present proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.