I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
25.11.2024
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2017 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Implementation of a judgment of the General Court - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2024/6937)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker, A. Sauka and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 31 May 2022 by which her name was not included in the list of officials promoted to grade AD 6 under the 2017 promotion exercise, as published in Administrative Notices No 25-2017 of 13 November 2017 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders XH to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6937/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—