EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-11/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – XH v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0011

62023TA0011

October 2, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6937

25.11.2024

(Case T-11/23)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2017 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Implementation of a judgment of the General Court - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)

(C/2024/6937)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker, A. Sauka and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 31 May 2022 by which her name was not included in the list of officials promoted to grade AD 6 under the 2017 promotion exercise, as published in Administrative Notices No 25-2017 of 13 November 2017 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders XH to pay the costs.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6937/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia