EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-746/22, Slovenské Energetické Strojárne: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Slovenské Energetické Strojárne A.S. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Detailed rules for the refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 20 – Request for additional information made by the Member State of refund – Information to be provided within a one-month period – Discontinuation of the procedure on account of failure by the taxable person to provide additional information within that time limit – Article 23 – Refusal to take account of information provided for the first time in the appeal procedure – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of VAT neutrality – Principle of good administration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0746

62022CA0746

May 16, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3884

(Case C-746/22,

Slovenské Energetické Strojárne)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Detailed rules for the refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund - Directive 2008/9/EC - Article 20 - Request for additional information made by the Member State of refund - Information to be provided within a one-month period - Discontinuation of the procedure on account of failure by the taxable person to provide additional information within that time limit - Article 23 - Refusal to take account of information provided for the first time in the appeal procedure - Principle of effectiveness - Principle of VAT neutrality - Principle of good administration)

(C/2024/3884)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Slovenské Energetické Strojárne A.S.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

1.The first subparagraph of Article 23(2) of Council Directive 2008/9/EC of 12 February 2008 laying down detailed rules for the refund of value added tax, provided for in Directive 2006/112/EC, to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund but established in another Member State, read in the light of the principles of value added tax (VAT) neutrality and effectiveness, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation under which a taxable person who has submitted an application for a refund of VAT is prohibited from providing, at the stage of the complaint before a second-tier tax authority, additional information, within the meaning of Article 20 of that directive, requested by the first-tier tax authority and which that taxable person did not provide to the latter authority within the one-month period laid down in Article 20(2) thereof, that period not constituting a limitation period.

2.Article 23 of Directive 2008/9 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation under which a tax authority must discontinue the VAT refund procedure where the taxable person has not provided, within the time limit, additional information requested by that authority under Article 20 of that directive and where, in the absence of that information, the VAT refund application cannot be processed, provided that the discontinuation decision is regarded as a decision refusing that refund application, within the meaning of Article 23(1), and that it can be the subject of an appeal meeting the requirements provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 23(2) of that same directive.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3884/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia