- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-134/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Article 29 TEU — Article 215 TFEU — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0134
62019CA0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 414/3
(Case C-134/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Article 29 TEU - Article 215 TFEU - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation - Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources - Action for damages - Jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures)
(2020/C 414/03)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Bank Refah Kargaran (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin and I. Boubaker, lawyers)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by: R. Tricot, C. Zadra and A. Tizzano, and subsequently by L. Gussetti, A. Bouquet, R. Tricot and J. Roberti di Sarsina, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Bank Refah Kargaran to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.