EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-164/09: Action brought on 3 April 2009 — Kitou v European Data Protection Supervisor

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0164

62009TN0164

April 3, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/44

(Case T-164/09)

2009/C 153/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Erasmia Kitou (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor

Form of order sought

declare that Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 is inapplicable;

in the alternative, declare an error of law in the application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in conjunction with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001;

consequently, annul the Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor 2008-0600;

declare that the request for access to the document does not satisfy the conditions laid down in Regulation No 45/2001;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor by which the latter found that the disclosure during national legal proceedings of certain data concerning the applicant’s career in the Commission of the European Communities is not contrary to the provisions of Regulations No 45/2001 (1) and No 1049/2001 (2).

In support of its action, the applicant claims that:

the contested decision is unfounded inasmuch as it is based on Regulation No 1049/2001 which is inapplicable in the present case, since the request for access does not concern a document within the meaning of Regulation No 1049/2001, but exclusively an item of personal data.

even if Regulations No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 were to apply in conjunction with one another in the present case, the defendant, when applying them, erred in considering that the conditions imposed by Regulation No 45/2001 concerning the processing of personal data apply only where the exception provided for in Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 regarding access to documents is applicable;

the defendant infringed the provisions of Regulation No 45/2001 inasmuch as the request for access did not concern a document and was not based on any of the conditions for permitting the processing of personal data.

Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (1).

Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (2).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia