- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-287/16: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA v Caisse Suisse de Compensation, Fundo de Garantia Automóvel, Sandra Cristina Crystello Pinto Moreira Pereira, Sandra Manuela Teixeira Gomes Seemann, Catarina Ferreira Seemann, José Batista Pereira and Teresa Rosa Teixeira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 72/166/EEC — Article 3(1) — Second Directive 84/5/EEC — Article 2(1) — Insurance contract concluded on the basis of false statements concerning the ownership of the vehicle and the identity of its usual driver — Policyholder — No economic interest in the conclusion of that contract — Insurance contract null and void — Whether that nullity may be invoked against third-party victims)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0287
62016CA0287
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.10.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/2
(Case C-287/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017338EN.01000201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017338EN.01000201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Second Directive 84/5/EEC - Article 2(1) - Insurance contract concluded on the basis of false statements concerning the ownership of the vehicle and the identity of its usual driver - Policyholder - No economic interest in the conclusion of that contract - Insurance contract null and void - Whether that nullity may be invoked against third-party victims))
(2017/C 338/02)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA
Defendants: Caisse Suisse de Compensation, Fundo de Garantia Automóvel, Sandra Cristina Crystello Pinto Moreira Pereira, Sandra Manuela Teixeira Gomes Seemann, Catarina Ferreira Seemann, José Batista Pereira and Teresa Rosa Teixeira
Operative part of the judgment
Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, and Article 2(1) of Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which would have the effect of making it possible to invoke against third-party victims, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, the nullity of a contract for motor vehicle insurance against civil liability arising as a result of the policyholder initially making false statements concerning the identity of the owner and of the usual driver of the vehicle concerned or from the fact that the person for whom or on whose behalf that insurance contract was concluded had no economic interest in the conclusion of that contract.
(<span class="note">1</span>) <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:326:TOC">OJ C 326, 6.9.2016</a>.