- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-660/22: Action brought on 27 October 2022 — Seopult v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0660
62022TN0660
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.12.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 482/28
(Case T-660/22)
(2022/C 482/37)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Seopult LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: A. Gaspar Schwalbach, C. Pinto Xavier and M. Cotrim, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul Articles 1, 4 and 5 of the European Commission’s Decision of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone (MFZ) — Regime III;
—order the European Commission to bear the entirety of the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-588/22, Renco Valore v Commission.