- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-14/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany)) — Hava Genc v Land Berlin (EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council — Article 6(1) — Concept of worker — Exercise of minor employment — Condition governing loss of acquired rights)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CA0014
62009CA0014
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 80/4
(Case C-14/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Article 6(1) - Concept of ‘worker’ - Exercise of minor employment - Condition governing loss of acquired rights)
2010/C 80/07
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hava Genc
Defendant: Land Berlin
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) — Interpretation of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC/Turkey Association Council — Right to remain of a Turkish national whose entry into the territory of the host Member State was based on a ground which no longer exists and whose professional activity, amounting to 5.5 hours per week, is merely minor — Minimum characteristics of a working relationship required for it to be considered ‘regular employment’ within the meaning of Decision No 1/80
Operative part of the judgment
A person in a situation such as that of the applicant in the main proceedings is a worker within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, provided that the employment in question is real and genuine. It is for the national court to carry out the examinations of fact necessary to determine whether that is so in the case pending before it.
A Turkish worker, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80, may rely on the right to free movement which he derives from the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, even if the purpose for which he entered the host Member State no longer exists. Where such a worker satisfies the conditions set out in Article 6(1) of that decision, his right of residence in the host Member State cannot be made subject to additional conditions as to the existence of interests capable of justifying residence or as to the nature of the employment.
Language of the case: German
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.