- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-527/21: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2022 — Abenante and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — EU Digital COVID Certificate — Freedom of movement for persons — Restrictions — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0527(01)
62021TB0527(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/36
(Case T-527/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Freedom of movement for persons - Restrictions - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 284/48)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Stefania Abenante (Ferrare, Italy) and the 423 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Sandri, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, P. López-Carceller and J. Rodrigues, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and S. Scarpa Ferraglio, acting as Agents)
Re:
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants are seeking annulment of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2021 on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ 2021 L 211, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application to intervene.
3.Ms Stefania Abenante and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings before the Court.
4.The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.