I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Article 63(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Act which upheld the applicant’s claims in their entirety – Inadmissibility
Community trade mark – Appeals procedure – Persons entitled to appeal and to be parties to the proceedings – Persons whose claims not upheld by a decision (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 63(4)) (see paras 30-32)
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2008 (Case R 889/2007-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd and Tresplain Investments Ltd.
Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:
The figurative mark ‘Golden Elephant Brand’ for goods in Class 30 – Community trade mark registration No 241810
Proprietor of the Community trade mark:
Tresplain Investments Ltd
Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:
Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:
The unregistered figurative mark ‘GOLDEN ELEPHANT’, which had been in use in the United Kingdom
Decision of the Cancellation Division:
Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.