I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-42/17) (*)
((Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Setting of the 2016 ex-ante contribution - Period for bringing an action - Out of time - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2019/C 44/75)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg eG (Siegburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and K. Rübsamen, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, S. Raes, A. Kopp and T. Van Dyck, lawyers)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and, second, of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern the applicant.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.VR-Bank Rhein-Sieg eG is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).
3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(<span class="super note-tag">1</span> OJ C 78, 13.3.2017)