I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 320/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA (Oggiono, Italy) (represented by: G. Cartella and B. Cartella, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Verband der Deutschen Daunen- und Federnindustrie (Magonza, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘ECODOWN’ — European Union trade mark No 2 756 740
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2021 in Case R 216/2020-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—consequently, rule on the merits confirming the validity of EU trade mark No 2 756 740
—order the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Incorrect consideration of the evidence submitted by the applicant regarding the distinctive character of the mark acquired through use.