EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-28/09: Action brought on 21 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0028

62009CN0028

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/28

(Case C-28/09)

(2009/C 69/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Oliver, A. Alcover San Pedro and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Form of order sought

declare that, by prohibiting lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, carrying certain goods, from being driven on a section of the A12 motorway, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 29 EC;

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The adoption of a sectoral prohibition against driving lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, loaded with certain goods, on the A12 motorway must be regarded as constituting a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction and is thus incompatible with Articles 28 EC and 29 EC. The disputed measure is neither appropriate nor necessary to achieve the improvement in air quality on the A12 required by Community law as it is not properly focused and does not take less restrictive measures, such as, for instance, permanent speed restrictions or emissions-dependent prohibitions on driving, into consideration. Furthermore, the defendant has not proved that there is a suitable alternative to road transport.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia