I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/2641)
Language of the case: Romanian
Appellants: Canal Sea Services SRL, Maritime Pilot SRL, Asociația Piloților Maritimi din România ‘Euxin Pilot’, Black Sea Pilots SRL, Asociația Piloților Maritimi ‘Trident’, Black Waters SA, Asociația Piloților Maritimi Independenți ‘Tomis’, RJ, NC, FR
Respondents: Ministerul Transporturilor, Infrastructurii și Comunicațiilor, Compania Națională ‘Administrația Porturilor Maritime’ SA
On the basis of the interpretation of Article 107(1) [TFEU] and of Regulation [(EU) 2017/352 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2017] establishing a framework for the provision of port services and common rules on the financial transparency of ports, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) does a measure adopted by a Member State aimed at ensuring that compulsory port pilotage services are carried out exclusively by certain State bodies – even though such services were previously also provided by other private (non-State) undertakings – establish a legal monopoly in accordance with Union law, constituting a permitted form of derogation from the competitive market, or, on the contrary, does this constitute State aid incompatible with the internal market, such as to exclude competition on the market and for the market?
—
(1) OJ 2017 L 57, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2641/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—