- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-552/22: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2023 — mataharispaclub v EUIPO — Rouha (SpaClubMatahari) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SpaClubMatahari — Absolute ground for invalidity — No bad faith — Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Inadmissibility — Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0552
62022TA0552
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/652
(Case T-552/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark SpaClubMatahari - Absolute ground for invalidity - No bad faith - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Inadmissibility - Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court)
(C/2023/652)
Language of the case: Czech
Parties
Applicant: mataharispaclub s.r.o. (Mníšek pod Brdy, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Diamant, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Alena Rouha (Prague, Czech Republic)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 June 2022 (Case R 937/2021-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
Language of the case: Czech.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/652/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*