I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 392/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Gifi Diffusion (Villeneuve-sur-Lot, France) (represented by: C. de Chassey, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Crocs, Inc. (Longmont, Colorado, United States)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design ‘Footwear’ — Community design No 733 282-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2015 in Case R 37/2015-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—invalidate the Community design No 000733282-0001;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the Applicant.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Articles 62 and 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.