- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-425/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — KU v EEAS (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — EEAS staff — Psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Reasonable time — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0425
62020TA0425
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/47
(Case T-425/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - EEAS staff - Psychological harassment - Administrative investigation - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment - Reasonable time - Liability)
(2022/C 237/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KU (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, R. Spáč, G. Pasqualetti and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 17 September 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance and, secondly, compensation for the harm which she claims to have suffered as a result of psychological harassment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders KU to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.