- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-573/11 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2013 — ClientEarth v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeals — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Action for annulment manifestly inadmissible — Grounds of the appeal manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CB0573
62011CB0573
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 344/37
(Case C-573/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeals - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party - Action for annulment manifestly inadmissible - Grounds of the appeal manifestly unfounded)
2013/C 344/64
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: ClientEarth (represented by: P. Kirch, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: C. Fekete and B. Driessen, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden
Re:
Appeal against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2011 in Case T-452/10 ClientEarth v Council, by which the General Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible an action seeking the annulment of the decision of the Council of 26 July 2010 refusing to allow the applicant full access to an opinion drafted by the Council Legal Service (document No 6865/09) regarding a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning public access to documents of the European Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.ClientEarth shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.