- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-604/21: Action brought on 21 September 2021 — WP and Others v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0604
62021TN0604
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.11.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 452/46
(Case T-604/21)
(2021/C 452/59)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: WP, WQ, WR (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the PMO.4 of 16 November 2020 rejecting the application lodged on 14 September 2020 in the name of the deceased to seek recovery of his national pension rights that were transferred to the EU pension scheme, together with any interest accrued on those rights for all those years, until repaid in full;
—annul, in so far as necessary, the express decision of 15 June 2021 rejecting the complaint of 15 February 2021 lodged in the name of the deceased, whose continuation by the estate was notified on 25 May 2021;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant was unjustly enriched.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment in that the application of the principle of unjust enrichment as affirmed by the case-law differs from the implementation of that principle by other institutions in otherwise identical situations.