I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 32, 37, 44)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006‑4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign EURO AUTOMATIC CASH as a Community trade mark.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 42 – application No 4114864
Decision of the Examiner:
Registration refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006-4);
2.Orders OHIM to pay four fifths of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;
3.Orders Européenne de traitement de l'information (Euro-Information) to pay one fifth of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;
4.Orders OHIM to pay the essential costs incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.