- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-32/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Daw v EUIPO (Muresko) (EU trade mark — EU word mark Muresko — Earlier national word marks Muresko — Claim for seniority of earlier national after registration of the EU trade mark marks — Articles 39 and 40 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Registration of earlier national marks having expired on the day of the claim)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0032
62021TA0032
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 471/49
(Case T-32/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - EU word mark Muresko - Earlier national word marks Muresko - Claim for seniority of earlier national after registration of the EU trade mark marks - Articles 39 and 40 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Registration of earlier national marks having expired on the day of the claim)
(2021/C 471/69)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2020 (Case R 1686/2020-4), concerning a claim for seniority of identical earlier national marks for the EU word mark Muresko No 15465719.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Daw SE to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.