EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-256/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 9 May 2016 — Deichmann SE v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0256
62016CN0256
May 9, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 260/29
(Case C-256/16)
(2016/C 260/36)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Deichmann SE
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg
Question referred
Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 (1) of 17 February 2016 establishing a procedure for assessing certain market economy treatment and individual treatment claims made by exporting producers from China and Vietnam, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 valid?
*
Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ 2016 L 41, p. 3.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.