- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-331/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2010 — REWE Zentral v OHIM — Grupo Corporativo Teype (Solfrutta) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Solfrutta — Earlier Community word mark FRUTISOL — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Partial refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TA0331
62008TA0331
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/47
(Case T-331/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Solfrutta - Earlier Community word mark FRUTISOL - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Partial refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 63/82
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: REWE Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL and REWE-Zentral AG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2);
2.Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 260 of 11.10.2008.