6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/47

(Case T-140/19)

(2019/C 155/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul, first, the applicant’s appraisal report of 25 April 2018;

—annul second, the decision of non-promotion of 18 June 2018;

—annul, third, the decision of 28 May 2018, rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance;

—annul, fourth, in so far as necessary, decision No R/400/18 of 21 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against his appraisal report and the decision of non-promotion;

—annul, fifth, in so far as necessary, decision No R/461/18 of 21 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision rejecting his request for assistance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, in support of the applicant’s claim for annulment of the decision rejecting his request for assistance, alleging manifest error of assessment, violation of the duty of care, infringement of the principle of good administration, and misuse of power.

2.Second plea in law, in support of the applicant’s claim for annulment of his appraisal report and the decision of non-promotion, alleging manifest error of assessment, omission of relevant facts and misuse of powers.