EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

WIELAND / AURUBIS ROLLED PRODUCTS / SCHWERMETALL

M.8900

WIELAND / AURUBIS ROLLED PRODUCTS / SCHWERMETALL
February 4, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMPETITION DG

Directorate R Unit R.2 COMP-MEETINGS

OPINION

of the ADVISORY COMMITTEE on MERGERS

given at its meeting of 29 January 2019

CONCERNING A PRELIMINARY DRAFT DECISION RELATING TO

CASE M.8900 Wieland/Aurubis Rolled Products/Schwermetall

Rapporteur: IRELAND

Operation

1.1. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the notified operation constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation No 139/2004 (the "Merger Regulation").

Union Dimension

2.2. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the notified operation has a Union dimension pursuant to Article 1(3) of the Merger Regulation.

Product Market

3.3. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s definitions of the relevant product markets as stated in the draft decision for the purpose of assessing the present operation, in particular:

a. The supply of billets and cakes, the distinction between billets and cakes being left open

b. the supply of pre-rolled strip;

c. the supply of rolled products, with significant differentiation between the high end part of the market and the low end part of the market

Geographic Market

4.4. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s definitions of the relevant geographic markets as stated in the draft decision, in particular:

a. The relevant markets for the supply of billets or cakes is EEA-wide in scope;

b. The relevant market for the supply of pre-rolled strip is EEA-wide in scope

c. The relevant market for the supply or rolled products is EEA wide in scope.

AdCom M.8900 dated of 29.01.2019 Competitive Assessment

2

Horizontal non-coordinated effects

5.5. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission's assessment on horizontal non-coordinated effects, namely that

a. The Transaction is likely to result in a significant impediment of effective competition through the removal of an important competitor on the rolled products market, with the likely result of an increase in prices

b. The Transaction is likely to result in a significant impediment of effective competition through the creation of a dominant position of Wieland on the rolled products market in the EEA.

6. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the acquisition of sole control in Schwermetall aggravates the horizontal effects in the sense that it strengthens Wieland's ability to raise the costs of its competitors in the rolled products market and provide Wieland access to rivals’ confidential information.

Vertical non-coordinated effects

7.7. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission's assessment that the Transaction will not significantly impede competition as a result of input foreclosure effects in relation to billets.

Commitments

8.8. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the

Commitments do not eliminate the significant impediment to effective competition

resulting from (i) the elimination of the important competitive constraints exerted on

Wieland by ARP and/or (ii) the creation of Wieland’s dominant position.

Compatibility with the internal market

10.10. The Advisory Committee (11 Member States) agrees with the Commission's view

that the notified concentration should be declared incompatible with the internal

market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement, in accordance with Articles 2(3)

and Article 8(3) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.

***

EUC

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia