I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 320/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: G. Macias Bonilla, P. López Ronda, G. Marín Raigal, E. Armero, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ffauf SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ZARA’ — Community trade mark registration No 732 958
Procedure before OHIM: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2015 in Case R 867/2014-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, in particular regarding the revocation of the CTM registration No 732958 ‘ZARA’ for the challenged goods in classes 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33;
—order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs those incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM.
—Infringement of Articles 42(2), 51(1)(a), 52(2) and 85(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Rules 22(3) and 22(4) of Regulation No 2868/95.