I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-531/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ROLF - Earlier international mark Wolf - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard)
(2021/C 329/39)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Wolf Oil Corporation NV (Hemiksem, Belgium) (represented by: T. Heremans and L. Depypere, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Kompari and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rolf Lubricants GmbH (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and S. Sullivan, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2020 (Case R 1958/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Wolf Oil Corporation and Rolf Lubricants.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wolf Oil Corporation NV to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.