- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-420/17: Action brought on 12 July 2017 — European Commission v French Republic
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0420
62017CN0420
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 300/25
(Case C-420/17)
(2017/C 300/29)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)
Defendant: French Republic
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that, by failing to take all the necessary measures to establish a general system of protection for the ortolan bunting in Landes, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds;
—order the French Republic to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Commission considers that France has never taken the necessary coherent and coordinated protective measures to establish a system of protection for the ortolan bunting, and has thus failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2009/147/EC. (<a id="ntc1-C_2017300EN.01002501-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017300EN.01002501-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
Language of the case: French.
(OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7)