- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-217/11 REV: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2017 — Staelen v Ombudsman (Non-contractual liability — Application for revision — Consequences of a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice partially setting aside a judgment of the General Court — No new facts — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0217
62011TB0217
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.2.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 42/24
(Case T-217/11 REV) (1)
((Non-contractual liability - Application for revision - Consequences of a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice partially setting aside a judgment of the General Court - No new facts - Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 042/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Claire Staelen (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Olona, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Ombudsman (represented by: initially G. Grill, then L. Papadias, acting as Agents, and A. Duron and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)
Re:
Application for revision of the judgment of 29 April 2015, Staelen v Ombudsman (T-217/11, EU:T:2015:238)
Operative part of the order
1.The application for revision is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Ms Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.