I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-562/10) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Procedure by default - Application to intervene - No need to adjudicate)
(2012/C 25/96)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: HTTS (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Kienzle and M. Schlingmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and Z. Kupčová, Agents)
Partial annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), in so far as the applicant’s name was included on the list of persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen.
The Court:
1.Decides that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany;
2.Annuls Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 in so far as it concerns HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH;
3.Maintains the effects of Regulation No 961/2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant for a period of no more than two months from the date of delivery of this judgment;
4.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.