I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/4629)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Agraya GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Späth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Agri Solutions (Ligota Wielka, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Food Pass – Application No 18 813 138
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2025 in Case R 1643/2024-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4629/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—