I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-113/15) (*)
((Dumping - Imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia - Rejection of applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid - Determination of the normal value and the export price - Single economic entity - Reflection of the anti-dumping duty in resale prices in the European Union - Application of a methodology different from that used in an earlier investigation - Article 2(9) and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Article 18.3.1 of the WTO anti-dumping agreement))
(2019/C 25/48)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: RFA International, LP (Calgary, Canada) (represented by: B. Evtimov and M. Krestiyanova, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment in whole or in part of Commission Implementing Decisions C(2014) 9805 final, C(2014) 9806 final, C(2014) 9807 final, C(2014) 9808 final, C(2014) 9811 final, C(2014) 9812 final and C(2014) 9816 final of 18 December 2014 concerning applications for refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders RFA International, LP to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.