Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

—

C/2025/4617

(Case T-399/25)

(C/2025/4617)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: KF (represented by: A. Cardinale, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the refusal by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme to accept the claim for reimbursement with scanner reference 240730.F41997A, seeking reimbursement as a matter of law of certain medical expenses incurred by him during the period from 18 December 2023 to 30 July 2024;

—cancel account statement number 1415, dated 12 August 2024 and issued under the said scheme;

—where appropriate, annul the decision rejecting complaint number R/650/24, dated 10 November 2024, lodged by the applicant with the appointing authority of the European Commission, pursuant to Article 90 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, against the aforementioned rejection, which rejection decision was implicitly made on 10 March 2025;

—where appropriate, declare that there is no legal basis for or, in the alternative, annul opinion number 121/24 formally issued by the Management Committee of the said Joint Scheme in relation to complaint number R/650/24;

—order the defendant to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 3 357,41, plus interest on that sum, with capitalisation, the starting date and the end date to be determined at the Court’s discretion;

—order the defendant to repay to the applicant all legal costs incurred by him in connection with these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

—Absolute failure to state reasons, also due to a complete lack of investigation, contradiction with previous decisions, unreasonableness, irrationality, confusion, manifest error of assessment, erroneous assumptions of fact and law, misrepresentation, misuse of powers, infringement of law, falsification of documents, and finally breach of the duties of sound management and good administration.

In that regard, the applicant argues that the contested decisions are unlawful, illegal, unfair, illicit and unjust in in so far as, in summary, they lack justification, were made on the basis of a completely inadequate investigation, are manifestly irrational and unreasonable, vitiated by manifest error of assessment and erroneous assumptions of fact and law, misrepresentation, misuse of powers, infringement of law, falsification of documents and, finally, breach of the duties of sound management and good administration

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4617/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—