- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-567/21, BNP Paribas: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — BNP Paribas SA v TR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Articles 33 and 36 — Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State — Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State — Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin — Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment — National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0567
62021CA0567
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.7.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/25
(Case C-567/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) BNP Paribas)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Articles 33 and 36 - Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State - Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State - Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin - Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment - National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings)
(2023/C 261/35)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: BNP Paribas SA
Defendant: TR
Operative part of the judgment
Article 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with Article 36 thereof,
must be interpreted as precluding the recognition, in the Member State addressed, of a judgment concerning an employment contract, given in the Member State of origin, from resulting in the inadmissibility of claims brought before a court of the Member State addressed on the ground that the legislation of the Member State of origin lays down a procedural rule for the centralisation of all claims relating to that employment contract, without prejudice to the procedural rules of the Member State addressed which are liable to apply once that recognition has occurred.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.
* * *