I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 391/33)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Neoperl AG (Reinach, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Börjes Pestalozza and U. Kaufmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU position mark (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert part)
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 June 2021 in Case R 2327/2019-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.