- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-356/19: Action brought on 12 June 2019 — Polisario Front v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0356
62019TN0356
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 270/35
(Case T-356/19)
(2019/C 270/36)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el-Hamra and Rio de Oro (Polisario Front) (represented by: G. Devers, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare its action for annulment admissible;
—annul the contested regulation;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action brought against Council Regulation (EU) 2019/440 of 29 November 2018 on the allocation of fishing opportunities under the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco and the Implementation Protocol thereto (OJ 2019 L 77, p.1), the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging lack of legal basis of that regulation on account of the illegality of Decision 2019/441.
That plea is divided into eleven parts which are essentially identical to the eleven pleas in Case T-344/19, Polisario Front v Council.
* * *