I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
5.2.2024
(C/2024/1106)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Ferrero Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and K. Wagner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ROSHEN CONFECTIONERY CORP. — Application for registration No 18 026 424
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2023 in Case R 2428/2022-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and reject the trade mark application at issue in its entirety;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, in case that the latter decides to intervene, to bear their own costs;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, in case that the latter decides to intervene, to pay the costs incurred by the applicant;
—in the alternative, remit the case to the Board of Appeal.
—Erroneous admission of evidence;
—Incomplete determination of the relevant public;
—Misjudgement of the use of ‘Rocher’ as an independent trade mark;
—Misjudgement of the independent distinctive character of ‘Rocher’ within ‘Ferrero Rocher’;
—Failure to establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1106/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)