EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1140/23: Action brought on 6 December 2023 — Ferrero Deutschland v EUIPO — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (ROSHEN CONFECTIONERY CORP.)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1140

62023TN1140

December 6, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1106

5.2.2024

(Case T-1140/23)

(C/2024/1106)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Ferrero Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and K. Wagner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kyiv, Ukraine)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ROSHEN CONFECTIONERY CORP. — Application for registration No 18 026 424

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2023 in Case R 2428/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and reject the trade mark application at issue in its entirety;

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, in case that the latter decides to intervene, to bear their own costs;

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, in case that the latter decides to intervene, to pay the costs incurred by the applicant;

in the alternative, remit the case to the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Erroneous admission of evidence;

Incomplete determination of the relevant public;

Misjudgement of the use of ‘Rocher’ as an independent trade mark;

Misjudgement of the independent distinctive character of ‘Rocher’ within ‘Ferrero Rocher’;

Failure to establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1106/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia