- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-768/15: Action brought on 28 December 2015 — RP Technik v OHIM — Tecnomarmi (RP ROYAL PALLADIUM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0768
62015TN0768
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.2.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/29
(Case T-768/15)
(2016/C 078/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme (Bönen, Germany) (represented by: P. Henrichs, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tecnomarmi Snc (Treviso, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘RP ROYAL PALLADIUM’ — Community trade mark application No 11 358 496
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2014 in Case R 2061/2014-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—in the alternative, order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if the intervener is not a party to the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.