I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 288/82)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Workspace Group plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Hine, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Technopolis Oyj (Oulu, Finland)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Application for registration No 16 443 111
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2019 in Case R 1910/2018-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—uphold the opposition decision;
—refuse the contested application;
—order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.