- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-196/10: Action brought on 29 April 2010 — Apotheke DocMorris v OHIM (Representation of a green and white cross)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0196
62010TN0196
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.7.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/46
(Case T-196/10)
(2010/C 179/81)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Apotheke DocMorris Holding GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by Y. Dick, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 February 2010 in Case R 470/2009-4;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a green and white cross, in respect of goods and services in Classes 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 21, 25, 29, 30, 32, 35-42 and 44 — Application No 5 930 979.
Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the Board of Appeal’s assessment in relation to establishing distinctiveness was incorrect in a number of respects.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).