- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-107/18: Action brought on 20 February 2018 — Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0107
62018TN0107
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.4.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/38
(Case T-107/18)
(2018/C 134/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Erkan Aytekin (Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dienne Salotti SRL a socio unico (Altamura, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Dienne — Application for registration No 15 080 302
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 in Case R 1444/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order Applicant/Intervener and/or the EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the Appellant in connection with this appeal, and all procedural costs generated by EUIPO decisions.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.