I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2021/C 297/19)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented by: E. Vahida and F. C. Laprévote, avocats, S. Rating, abogado, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, and V. Blanc, avocate)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, French Republic
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment under appeal;
—declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that Commission Decision C(2020) 2097 final of 31 March 2020 on State Aid SA.56765 (2020/N) — France — Covid-19 — Deferral of the payment of airline taxes in favour of public air transport undertakings is void; and
—order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ryanair, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs;
alternatively:
—set aside the judgment under appeal;
—refer back the case to the General Court for reconsideration; and
—reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.
In support of the action, the appellant relies on five pleas in law.
First, the General Court infringed EU law in rejecting the appellant’s claim that the non-discrimination principle has been unjustifiably violated.
Second, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the appellant’s claim on free movement of services.
Third, the General Court erred in law in its determination of the proportionality of the aid to the quantum of the damage under Article 107(2)(b) TFEU.
Fourth, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the Commission’s failure to state reasons.
Fifth, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the Commission’s failure to open a formal investigation procedure.
—